We’re currently upgrading our membership platform to bring you an improved experience. During this transition, access to member accounts is temporarily unavailable. We appreciate your patience and can’t wait to share the new and improved system with you soon!
For urgent membership questions, please contact info@clpsychiatry.org.
Journal Article Annotations
2025, 2nd Quarter
Annotations by John A R Grimaldi MD, Mary Ann Cohen MD, FAPM, Kelly Cozza MD, DFAPA, FACLP, Luis Pereira MD
July, 2025
Findings:
This retrospective, cohort study explored the effect of attending at least one clinic visit with a mental health provider, on HIV care outcomes of patients attending an HIV primary care clinic during the 2-year study period. The primary outcome measures were in accord with CDC-defined retention in care – attending 2 HIV clinic appointments 90 days apart within a 12-month period and viral suppression. The proportion of patients who attended 2 HIV clinic visits in the 12 months following an appointment with a mental health provider did not differ significantly from the proportion meeting this criterion prior seeing a mental health provider. However, there was a significant difference in the percentage of patients with viral suppression, 57% vs 80% (p<0.0001), before and after mental health intervention, respectively. Additionally, older patients and those with greater number of more mental health visits were more likely to be virally suppressed.
Strengths and limitations:
The southeastern region of the US has a greater number of people living with HIV (PLW) than any other part of the country. Additionally, a larger proportion of PWH in the SE are living in rural areas where access to HIV prevention and treatment resources is limited. Study participants were receiving care in a Ryan White Program-funded clinic located in a safety-net hospital system in Memphis, TN, which attracts patients from an underserved population in the surrounding states of Mississippi and Arkansas. The inclusion of a broad range of mental health providers comprising licensed counselors, psychiatric nurse practitioners, and psychiatrists, suggests that findings may be applicable to settings with limited resources. The study aimed to demonstrate that even a modest intervention such as one visit with a mental health provider may have significant benefit. Study participants did not include clinic patients with mental health disorders who did not access mental health services either within or outside the heath-care system, which limits study findings. Other limitations include the lack of a comparison group, and lack of subgroup analysis of patients with comorbid substance use. The study’s retrospective, observational design limits any conclusions about causality.
Relevance:
Psychiatric disorders are a risk factor for HIV acquisition, are overrepresented in people with HIV, and are associated with poorer treatment adherence and increased morbidity and mortality in PWH. Ample research has demonstrated that identification and treatment of mental health disorders lead to better HIV outcomes and overall quality of life. It is promising that even as modest an intervention as one visit with a licensed mental health provider may be beneficial. Additionally, increasing the number of visits may increase the likelihood of viral suppression. The study subjects’ location in an understudied, poorly resourced and relatively rural region adds significance to study findings. The study setting’s dependence on the federally funded Ryan White Program is important as government support for healthcare for underserved and vulnerable populations is currently being questioned.
Findings:
This pilot, randomized controlled trial of a transdiagnostic, modular, group, cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of this virtual 12-week intervention in older PWH. Secondary outcome measures included psychological distress, health risk behaviors, health-related quality of life, and inflammation biomarkers, A recruitment rate of 77.5%, with 86.7% of participants completing follow-up, were consistent with benchmarks of feasibility and acceptability in previous pilot trials of psycho-behavioral intervention studies. Qualitative feedback from participants indicated the value of an accessible, online platform, and the importance of a group format to increase socialization. The quality of facilitation and content of the modules also favorably influenced participation satisfaction and acceptability. Although this was a pilot study and not powered to detect significant differences between the two arms, there was a detectable signal in the data suggesting a possible benefit to the intervention compared to control. Participants in the group intervention experienced meaningful improvements from baseline in depression, anxiety, and quality of life scores. Neither intervention nor control group showed meaningful change from baseline in health behaviors such as HIV-specific stress, nicotine dependence, alcohol use, physical activity or diet. The results for inflammation biomarkers were mixed. Both groups showed a reduction in interleukin-6, but an increase in C-reactive protein. Overall, this one-year study provides data that can be extrapolated to estimate what could be accomplished by a larger study given more time and a larger budget.
Strengths and limitations:
The strengths of this study included its randomized, controlled design, use of standardized measures, and inclusion of biomarkers. Qualitative assessments provided meaningful data that can be used to inform and strengthen the quality of future, larger, higher-powered efficacy trials. The intervention – CBT modules delivered in a group format – was transdiagnostic and evidence-informed, and leveraged multiple CBT evidence-based strategies. Additionally, the potential for bias was mitigated by having a research assistant, as opposed to the intervention facilitators, conduct interviews. Although the use of biomarkers enhanced the study by probing underlying biological mechanisms, they lacked precision and did not control for time of day, medication use, acute illness, body composition, or encourage fasting/non-fasting prior to blood draw. However, the study’s primary goal of evaluating feasibility was met by demonstrating participants’ willingness to provide biospecimens. Budget and timeframe limitations resulted in a small sample size and meant that the study was underpowered to assess significant differences between arms. At baseline, participants were relatively mentally well with low levels of unhealthy risk behaviors, thus introducing a floor effect. However, this problem could be addressed by enrolling older participants with greater needs in future iterations. Also, a longer timeframe would permit post-intervention improvements in psychological distress to influence downstream behavior change.
Relevance:
The remarkable success of antiretroviral therapy has created a critical need to address problems associated with aging in people with HIV. CDC estimates that over half of PWH in the US are aged 50 or older. This population is disproportionately affected by age-related comorbidities, including neurodegenerative disorders as well as psychosocial complications of living with HIV. Additionally, there is growing research interest in investigating chronic HIV immune activation, despite virologic control, as a significant pathway linking underlying inflammation and associated medical and psychiatric comorbidity. However, interventions aimed at disrupting this pathway are lacking and research into effective treatments for these age-related conditions is limited. More specifically, there is a dearth of knowledge on the effects of CBT on inflammatory processes in PWH. By establishing the feasibility and acceptability of the CHAMP intervention, this pilot study paves the way for conducting a more rigorous trial to determine treatment efficacy and mechanisms of action. This study also addressed an increasing public health need among older PWH by identifying key characteristics that would make interventions more acceptable to this population. Future studies using larger sample sizes and better biomarker study designs are needed to explore the impact of CBT on reducing inflammation and immune activation biomarkers in older PWH.